Read my post about Palin being chosen by McCain before you read this elaborate post.
I am absolutely disgusted. If you haven’t heard / read her speech, do so now (pasted below). If you have read her speech, skip down to “My miniature critique.”
Governor Sarah Palin’s speech (Thurs. Sept, 4th at RNC)
Mr. Chairman, delegates, and fellow citizens: I am honored to be considered for the nomination for Vice President of the United States…
I accept the call to help our nominee for president to serve and defend America.
I accept the challenge of a tough fight in this election… against confident opponents … at a crucial hour for our country.
And I accept the privilege of serving with a man who has come through much harder missions … and met far graver challenges … and knows how tough fights are won – the next president of the United States, John S. McCain.
It was just a year ago when all the experts in Washington counted out our nominee because he refused to hedge his commitment to the security of the country he loves.
With their usual certitude, they told us that all was lost – there was no hope for this candidate who said that he would rather lose an election than see his country lose a war.
But the pollsters and pundits overlooked just one thing when they wrote him off.
They overlooked the caliber of the man himself – the determination, resolve, and sheer guts of Senator John McCain. The voters knew better.
And maybe that’s because they realize there is a time for politics and a time for leadership … a time to campaign and a time to put our country first.
Our nominee for president is a true profile in courage, and people like that are hard to come by.
He’s a man who wore the uniform of this country for 22 years, and refused to break faith with those troops in Iraq who have now brought victory within sight.
And as the mother of one of those troops, that is exactly the kind of man I want as commander in chief. I’m just one of many moms who’ll say an extra prayer each night for our sons and daughters going into harm’s way.
Our son Track is 19.
And one week from tomorrow – September 11th – he’ll deploy to Iraq with the Army infantry in the service of his country.
My nephew Kasey also enlisted, and serves on a carrier in the Persian Gulf.
My family is proud of both of them and of all the fine men and women serving the country in uniform. Track is the eldest of our five children.
In our family, it’s two boys and three girls in between – my strong and kind-hearted daughters Bristol, Willow, and Piper.
And in April, my husband Todd and I welcomed our littlest one into the world, a perfectly beautiful baby boy named Trig. From the inside, no family ever seems typical.
That’s how it is with us.
Our family has the same ups and downs as any other … the same challenges and the same joys.
Sometimes even the greatest joys bring challenge.
And children with special needs inspire a special love.
To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming place for your sons and daughters.
I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House. Todd is a story all by himself.
He’s a lifelong commercial fisherman … a production operator in the oil fields of Alaska’s North Slope … a proud member of the United Steel Workers’ Union … and world champion snow machine racer.
Throw in his Yup’ik Eskimo ancestry, and it all makes for quite a package.
We met in high school, and two decades and five children later he’s still my guy. My Mom and Dad both worked at the elementary school in our small town.
And among the many things I owe them is one simple lesson: that this is America, and every woman can walk through every door of opportunity.
My parents are here tonight, and I am so proud to be the daughter of Chuck and Sally Heath. Long ago, a young farmer and habber-dasher from Missouri followed an unlikely path to the vice presidency.
A writer observed: “We grow good people in our small towns, with honesty, sincerity, and dignity.” I know just the kind of people that writer had in mind when he praised Harry Truman.
I grew up with those people.
They are the ones who do some of the hardest work in America … who grow our food, run our factories, and fight our wars.
They love their country, in good times and bad, and they’re always proud of America. I had the privilege of living most of my life in a small town.
I was just your average hockey mom, and signed up for the PTA because I wanted to make my kids’ public education better.
When I ran for city council, I didn’t need focus groups and voter profiles because I knew those voters, and knew their families, too.
Before I became governor of the great state of Alaska, I was mayor of my hometown.
And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves.
I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a “community organizer,” except that you have actual responsibilities. I might add that in small towns, we don’t quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren’t listening.
We tend to prefer candidates who don’t talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco.
As for my running mate, you can be certain that wherever he goes, and whoever is listening, John McCain is the same man. I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment.
And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone.
But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion – I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country. Americans expect us to go to Washington for the right reasons, and not just to mingle with the right people.
Politics isn’t just a game of clashing parties and competing interests.
The right reason is to challenge the status quo, to serve the common good, and to leave this nation better than we found it.
No one expects us to agree on everything.
But we are expected to govern with integrity, good will, clear convictions, and … a servant’s heart.
I pledge to all Americans that I will carry myself in this spirit as vice president of the United States. This was the spirit that brought me to the governor’s office, when I took on the old politics as usual in Juneau … when I stood up to the special interests, the lobbyists, big oil companies, and the good-ol’ boys network.
Sudden and relentless reform never sits well with entrenched interests and power brokers. That’s why true reform is so hard to achieve.
But with the support of the citizens of Alaska, we shook things up.
And in short order we put the government of our state back on the side of the people.
I came to office promising major ethics reform, to end the culture of self-dealing. And today, that ethics reform is the law.
While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor’s office that I didn’t believe our citizens should have to pay for.
That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.
I also drive myself to work.
And I thought we could muddle through without the governor’s personal chef – although I’ve got to admit that sometimes my kids sure miss her. I came to office promising to control spending – by request if possible and by veto if necessary.
Senator McCain also promises to use the power of veto in defense of the public interest – and as a chief executive, I can assure you it works.
Our state budget is under control.
We have a surplus.
And I have protected the taxpayers by vetoing wasteful spending: nearly half a billion dollars in vetoes.
I suspended the state fuel tax, and championed reform to end the abuses of earmark spending by Congress.
I told the Congress “thanks, but no thanks,” for that Bridge to Nowhere.
If our state wanted a bridge, we’d build it ourselves. When oil and gas prices went up dramatically, and filled up the state treasury, I sent a large share of that revenue back where it belonged – directly to the people of Alaska.
And despite fierce opposition from oil company lobbyists, who kind of liked things the way they were, we broke their monopoly on power and resources.
As governor, I insisted on competition and basic fairness to end their control of our state and return it to the people.
I fought to bring about the largest private-sector infrastructure project in North American history.
And when that deal was struck, we began a nearly forty billion dollar natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence.
That pipeline, when the last section is laid and its valves are opened, will lead America one step farther away from dependence on dangerous foreign powers that do not have our interests at heart.
The stakes for our nation could not be higher.
When a hurricane strikes in the Gulf of Mexico, this country should not be so dependent on imported oil that we are forced to draw from our Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
And families cannot throw away more and more of their paychecks on gas and heating oil.
With Russia wanting to control a vital pipeline in the Caucasus, and to divide and intimidate our European allies by using energy as a weapon, we cannot leave ourselves at the mercy of foreign suppliers.
To confront the threat that Iran might seek to cut off nearly a fifth of world energy supplies … or that terrorists might strike again at the Abqaiq facility in Saudi Arabia … or that Venezuela might shut off its oil deliveries … we Americans need to produce more of our own oil and gas.
And take it from a gal who knows the North Slope of Alaska: we’ve got lots of both.
Our opponents say, again and again, that drilling will not solve all of America’s energy problems – as if we all didn’t know that already.
But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all.
Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we’re going to lay more pipelines … build more new-clear plants … create jobs with clean coal … and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal, and other alternative sources.
We need American energy resources, brought to you by American ingenuity, and produced by American workers. I’ve noticed a pattern with our opponent.
Maybe you have, too.
We’ve all heard his dramatic speeches before devoted followers.
And there is much to like and admire about our opponent.
But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform – not even in the state senate.
This is a man who can give an entire speech about the wars America is fighting, and never use the word “victory” except when he’s talking about his own campaign. But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed … when the roar of the crowd fades away … when the stadium lights go out, and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot – what exactly is our opponent’s plan? What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he’s done turning back the waters and healing the planet? The answer is to make government bigger … take more of your money … give you more orders from Washington … and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world. America needs more energy … our opponent is against producing it.
Victory in Iraq is finally in sight … he wants to forfeit.
Terrorist states are seeking new-clear weapons without delay … he wants to meet them without preconditions.
Al Qaeda terrorists still plot to inflict catastrophic harm on America … he’s worried that someone won’t read them their rights? Government is too big … he wants to grow it.
Congress spends too much … he promises more.
Taxes are too high … he wants to raise them. His tax increases are the fine print in his economic plan, and let me be specific.
The Democratic nominee for president supports plans to raise income taxes … raise payroll taxes … raise investment income taxes … raise the death tax … raise business taxes … and increase the tax burden on the American people by hundreds of billions of dollars. My sister Heather and her husband have just built a service station that’s now opened for business – like millions of others who run small businesses.
How are they going to be any better off if taxes go up? Or maybe you’re trying to keep your job at a plant in Michigan or Ohio … or create jobs with clean coal from Pennsylvania or West Virginia … or keep a small farm in the family right here in Minnesota.
How are you going to be better off if our opponent adds a massive tax burden to the American economy? Here’s how I look at the choice Americans face in this election.
In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers.
And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change.
They’re the ones whose names appear on laws and landmark reforms, not just on buttons and banners, or on self-designed presidential seals.
Among politicians, there is the idealism of high-flown speechmaking, in which crowds are stirringly summoned to support great things.
And then there is the idealism of those leaders, like John McCain, who actually do great things. They’re the ones who are good for more than talk … the ones we have always been able to count on to serve and defend America. Senator McCain’s record of actual achievement and reform helps explain why so many special interests, lobbyists, and comfortable committee chairmen in Congress have fought the prospect of a McCain presidency – from the primary election of 2000 to this very day.
Our nominee doesn’t run with the Washington herd.
He’s a man who’s there to serve his country, and not just his party.
A leader who’s not looking for a fight, but is not afraid of one either. Harry Reid, the Majority Leader of the current do-nothing Senate, not long ago summed up his feelings about our nominee.
He said, quote, “I can’t stand John McCain.” Ladies and gentlemen, perhaps no accolade we hear this week is better proof that we’ve chosen the right man. Clearly what the Majority Leader was driving at is that he can’t stand up to John McCain. That is only one more reason to take the maverick of the Senate and put him in the White House. My fellow citizens, the American presidency is not supposed to be a journey of “personal discovery.” This world of threats and dangers is not just a community, and it doesn’t just need an organizer.
And though both Senator Obama and Senator Biden have been going on lately about how they are always, quote, “fighting for you,” let us face the matter squarely.
There is only one man in this election who has ever really fought for you … in places where winning means survival and defeat means death … and that man is John McCain. In our day, politicians have readily shared much lesser tales of adversity than the nightmare world in which this man, and others equally brave, served and suffered for their country.
It’s a long way from the fear and pain and squalor of a six-by-four cell in Hanoi to the Oval Office.
But if Senator McCain is elected president, that is the journey he will have made.
It’s the journey of an upright and honorable man – the kind of fellow whose name you will find on war memorials in small towns across this country, only he was among those who came home.
To the most powerful office on earth, he would bring the compassion that comes from having once been powerless … the wisdom that comes even to the captives, by the grace of God … the special confidence of those who have seen evil, and seen how evil is overcome. A fellow prisoner of war, a man named Tom Moe of Lancaster, Ohio, recalls looking through a pin-hole in his cell door as Lieutenant Commander John McCain was led down the hallway, by the guards, day after day.
As the story is told, “When McCain shuffled back from torturous interrogations, he would turn toward Moe’s door and flash a grin and thumbs up” – as if to say, “We’re going to pull through this.” My fellow Americans, that is the kind of man America needs to see us through these next four years.
For a season, a gifted speaker can inspire with his words.
For a lifetime, John McCain has inspired with his deeds.
If character is the measure in this election … and hope the theme … and change the goal we share, then I ask you to join our cause. Join our cause and help America elect a great man as the next president of the United States.
Thank you all, and may God bless America.
The written speech is courtesy of the Herald Tribune.
Please post a comment below about what you thought about the speech, especially if you support Palin and/or the McCain and Palin ticket. To put it bluntly, I feel like all she did was send low blows toward Obama and didn’t even talk that much about her own plans to better the country. Furthermore, Palin focused so much on the whole Prisoner Of War thing and also about McCain’s character. If we elected people solely on their character, we’d elect the nicest guy alive, not the best politician.
Since I’m actually talking, I’ll keep ranting. There were a few more sections of the speech I was disgusted by.
My miniature critique
But the fact that drilling won’t solve every problem is no excuse to do nothing at all.
What about the problems it does pose? Like the money it will cost and the animals we will kill or take the land away from? Not to mention, it is putting lots of money into something that will not help us find alternative means…
Victory in Iraq is finally in sight … he wants to forfeit.
Please define “in sight.” It’s been eight years or so now and I sure as hell don’t see us getting any closer to ending it, just more and more dead American soldiers and less and less money in our Federal Bank (or rather more and more debt).
How are you going to be better off if our opponent adds a massive tax burden to the American economy? Here’s how I look at the choice Americans face in this election.
You fail to notice the fact that: yes, people will pay more taxes, but also that education will be better off, we will take leaps in the direction of losing our national debt, we will take steps toward a better health care system, and so on…
How can you expect to get out of a whole by cutting taxes?? Obviously, you can’t just count on people to spend that extra money in the right places. After all, could you trust an individual on the street you loan money to? He says he’s starving, but maybe he just wants a few last beers before he dies. The thing is, creating more revenue for the federal bank by increasing taxes is a way that we can actually fight our way out of this financial hole we are in with certainty, yet McCain’s ticket (and most of Conservatives) have failed to see that.
He’s a man who’s there to serve his country, and not just his party.
At this point I was just saying “Give me a break…”
If character is the measure in this election
How about politics? After all, that’s the field you all work in and the reason for which you govern the country.
Okay, I hope you read through most of it, at least the section where I broke down what I thought were ridiculous pieces of the speech. Please comment with your views and opinions, I will gladly read them and respond, regardless of the point of view, I’m happy to debate!
September 5, 2008 at 5:35 am |
You probably knew I was coming over. =)
I liked all of her speech, she broke down what Obama talked about and I don’t think I saw a bad comment in there that was not true.
“victory is in sight”
She means that if we stay there then we can eventually pull back out. They are already building up the people there, training them to fight for themselves, and building their own democracy. I think that is a good part of the whole war. True that soilders are still dying right now, but I’m willing to bet you that if you went and asked the soilders yourself if they would rather stay and finish this thing or pull out they would choose to stay.
“drilling”
I personally think we should drill. There is no successful way to make a alternative fuel car without oil right now. Simply because every car, even those solar powered and electrical cars they are putting out, still need oil to lubricate the ball-joint that turns the wheels. So we will still need oil regardless.
As for the whole endangering animals worry, most of the animals in that area are moose and caribu, and they like the heat that power plants put off. The only animal deaths that would happen would most likely be accidental.
We need to be self supplied and not depend on other countries to supply our needs. So I think drilling here is better then negotiating with another nation, especially one that hates us.
“taxes”
I just laughed at this one.
I’m a member of the working force. I have no desire to pay more higher taxes. And the people working in the schools don’t get paid worth crap so in turn, they don’t teach very well. I was tutored at home because I was not learning anything in school. Every single graduate that I meet at my work or on the street, they are ignorant to alot of things that happen around them. Most of them can’t even count or write properly, because they have machines to do it for them. But then again most kids in school are so involved in their social lifestyle that they don’t care about their schooling anyway. They crunch enough to pass a class and forget it. So raising taxes for better schooling is not a good idea in my opinion. We have enough teachers, we need to pay them more money. Or make it easier for them to make ends meet. It’s a proven fact, if a person hates their job and doesn’t get paid enough half asses it. But if they hate their job but still get paid a decent wage tend to actually do their job right.
And as for health care, we have good health care already. There is nothing wrong with it. Same as the schools. It’s the people who run it that make it suck, namely, the government.
So yay for tax cuts! On that.
And lastly, about the remark about voting for a guy soley on character is bad, because we should elect a politician….how often has that worked in that past?
I think it’s time for a change, having a completely different type of president will be refreshing, if not interesting, to see what the outcome will be.
September 5, 2008 at 6:12 am |
@Kurina:
Thanks for commenting again (you are my first loyal blog reader and I like that very much
).
As for your points, let me try to respond to some of them in a different way than the one I went over them in my post.
“victory in sight”: Yes the soldiers would mostly likely want to stay in, and this is why. I’m sorry to say but stereotypically, the soldiers all come from the same demographic. Most of them simply do it for the money they get aided with for college but I could safely say that MOST are lower aged males who consider themselves VERY nationalistic and also are sort of elitist in regards to other countries. I’ve talked to many soldiers and have been around a lot of them and I VERY often hear things along the lines of “Let’s kick some ____ *beep*” (fill the blank with any nationality you wish). Obviously, they feel like they are doing a good deed where they are and would like to stay. On the other hand, all those who have friends or family who have died in the war will tell you they’d like to come home. And if they don’t say it, it’s in shame to sound ‘weak-minded,’ but I’m almost certain being directly affected by the war makes one really think over the decision of fighting.
“drilling”: You bring up an interesting point but you forget the fact that other than accidental deaths drilling might cause, there will also be tons of animals with lost homes because of their habitat being destroyed and their lifestyle totally disrupted. Now, for those who don’t care much about the animals, my other idea about the drilling is that it will be expensive and isn’t even something we should count on for oil. In 15 or so years, our resources will be so dry that we will have had to change to something else by then or may run the risk of having corruption to a level we have never seen it (when it comes to the collection of gasoline, etc…).
“taxes”: You have to realize that many people live in VERY difficult situations due to the economic state of our country and that when Obama says to higher taxes, yes it might be annoying to the individual (as you say), but that is a HUGE amount of good it will bring to the country. For me, that is the only RELIABLE method to leave behind the debt of this country. The republican philosophy of increasing the wealth of this country (or reducing the debt rather) is to cut the taxes to RELY on people to spend that ‘extra’ money in places that will revitalize the economy. How can you DEPEND on people who haven’t shown they could do what they say they should be able to do? I mean, didn’t Bush say he would cut taxes as well? Look where THAT brought us. Also, this country does not have good health care. If you think it does, you are ignoring the enormous part of this population that actually cannot get medical insurance because it is too hefty of a price to pay.
Finally, when you say “I think it’s time for a change,” I laughed (no offense intended at all, I promise) simply because of how much McCain’s policies resemble those of our very own George W. Bush. Like the ‘good guys’ all say: if you want more of the same, vote McCain. If you want change, vote Obama.
Look forward to your response and an other intriguing debate. Cheers,
TJ
September 6, 2008 at 4:16 am |
So, you’re saying that patriotism is a bad thing?
I don’t think wanting to kick it back at the ones who attacked us is being ‘nationalist’, I think it’s being fair.
It’s like letting a bully get away with beating up your kid brother. You’re gonna want to beat him up, even worse because he hurt someone you loved. Same concept goes for this war. They attacked us, so we attack them back. And we shouldn’t give up when we’ve gone this long.
And just to clear up some things, the death toll for this war is nothing compared to every other war we have had. To sum up the total death count it is roughly about 4-5k. That pales when you compare them to both World Wars, Vietnam, and the golf war.(unless my numbers are off, but it’s still not nearly as many deaths as any of those wars had)
And in response to the ‘family/friends who die in the war’ comment. I don’t think it’s 100% accurate. Because I know a few people who’s families are in the war and that have died and most of them want to fight even more after that happened. But it’s really just opinions. If soilders want to stay and finish the fight we should allow them to. It’s for the good of the country to stay there and finish. I’d like to know what you’d think what would happen if we pulled out after everything has happened over there already.
“drilling”
You didn’t comment on the whole ‘we still need oil as a lubricant’ comment I made. Because unless you make a plastic car, with plastic gears and stuff you will still need oil to run a car. Maybe not for fuel but to keep the wheels moving. And that won’t even work because a plastic car wouldn’t be a very safe thing on the road..think of how mutilated you’d be if you ended up in a car crash. D:
And in response to animals losing their homes. There is a thing called ‘relocating’ we usually do do that if we are building on land with critters living on it. Most animals can adapt to any enviroment change anyway, so that argument isn’t very solid.
“taxes”
Just curious, do you have alot of money? I’m just curious, because you are probably the only person that I’ve spoken to that is actually for higher taxes that isn’t a politician. (or are you? lol)
The government was created to serve the people and this country, not tax them to death and take their money to fund their own government programs. Programs that don’t work. Again, look at our health care, welfare, and school systems. Even child services isn’t even run right, and they are in charge of childrens’ well being. That’s pretty sad. So I don’t think that the government should be in control of everything anymore. Our money, we earned it, most of it should go to us.
And I’ll go and say a lil bit on health care since I just slammed myself a little there. lol
Yes, health care could stand to be better. But it is still there. Health insurance is different than health care. Health care is free, no doctor can refuse you service at a hospital. They still have to take care of your problems when you go there. Now a regular doctor is different in a way. I personally think it should all be the same, but whatever. Point is, since it’s run by the government it isn’t working very well, and if we let them take even more control of it, and expand it, it’s not going to be any more affordable. Another reason why raising taxes isn’t a very good idea. In my opinion.
I’d like to know how McCain is exactly like Bush.
True, they share alot of the same opinions. But McCain has alot of different views than Bush also. Such as the Surge in the war, (which worked btw) Bush was against that. Bush is also against alternative fuels, which McCain and Palin both want to explore, but in a realistic fashion.
Seriously, how realistic is any of Obama’s promises. You can’t win the war by negotiating with terrorist. That just doesn’t work. You know why? Cuz they are TERRORIST. They pretend to be nice until they get what they want, then they move in and destroy and conquor.(and if you deny that, I’m done arguing with you on this topic..)
And my eyes hurt now so I’m gonna stop there… lol
September 6, 2008 at 4:31 am |
I agree with most of your comments and am afraid I’ll have to agree to disagree with most of them for now.
However, about my financial situation. I’m still only 18 and so would not feel the consequences of a tax raise myself, just yet. That being said, I’d like you to look at the populations that make up both parties.
Generally speaking, the wealthier people are socially more oriented toward the right of the spectrum (where they wish to have taxes cut) whereas the more poor people are more on the left side. Do you agree with that?
Now, if you do, answer this question for me please. After all the republicans have been saying about putting country before party, do you think it’s normal that they all want their taxes cut when it is the most obvious, secure, and certain way to actually increase the country’s wealth? Wouldn’t that be putting themselves before their country?
It’s crazy that even though many people on the right of the spectrum are so ready to go out and fight for their country, they aren’t willing to put aside a bit more money to improve the state of the country they live in…
September 6, 2008 at 6:34 am |
I don’t agree with the left usually. I am a moderate/independant with mostly right wing views though. There are times I do agree with the left though, just none come to mind right now.
No offense intended, but generally speaking, if you aren’t going to feel the burden of the raised taxes then you really can’t debate on that topic. You have to be able to know what both sides of the debate feels and then make the choice. I have not had much money in my life, I usually can just make it every month(barely). But that was fine for me. But to raise taxes will make it almost impossible for me, and many others, to make ends meet. It simply isn’t in our(the american people) best interest.
When they say put country first, they aren’t just talking about money. They are talking about home land security. Protecting this country, and it’s people. It’s not just about money, though money does play a pretty big part in this.
I don’t think the government is capable of improving the state of our country right now. We have homeless here, hungry here, and unemployment here. None of that is going to be fixed by raising taxes. Raising taxes won’t make new jobs for people. Raising taxes won’t make medical insurance more affordable. Raising taxes won’t help us win the war, And raising taxes won’t help the homeless and hungry.(if it will then please explain to me how and why)
I have no problem agreeing to disagreeing. I just can’t see the logic in the left wings’ way in fixing our state of country..